EQ

1.

I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.

2.

a.  What is the most important factor in healthy weight loss?

• Does NOT meet the Rule of Three.
• This EQ does not meet the Rule of Three because it did not meet three of the three requirements. The requirements not meet are framework, stance, and format. The reason I believe this is because of how healthy weight loss was defined. Healthy weight loss is very broad as it can defer greatly depending on what kind of weight loss method is used along with the kind of person that is losing weight. Because healthy weight loss is not defined (meaning that it is not formatted correctly), it won't allow for a proper framework for in-depth research. At the same time, because this EQ does not specify a kind of healthy weight loss, the author cannot take a stance.

 b.  What is most important to securing a conviction in a criminal investigation?

• Does NOT meet the Rule of Threes.
• This EQ does not meet the Rule of Three. Because it did not meet one of the three requirements. The requirement that was not meet is stance. The reason I believe this is because of the nature of the topic and the question. The EQ talks about the most important thing to secure a conviction during a criminal investigation. In reality, the only way to secure a conviction is to win the jury's or judge's mind through speaking, reasoning, and evidence. Because there is already a firmly established answer to the EQ, the author cannot take a stance.

 c.  What is most important in creating a hairstyle that best satisfies a customer?

• Does NOT meet the Rule of Three.
• This EQ does not meet the Rule of Three. Because it did not meet two of the three requirements. The requirements that were not meet are format and stance. The reason I believe this is because the question did not define who the customer is. Different people want different hairstyles and this EQ did not define who those customers are. Are they middle-aged woman, working males, etc.? Because the kind of customer was not defined, the EQ is not properly formatted. Because the EQ was not properly formatted and specific, the author cannot take a proper stance with the EQ.

 d.  How can an anesthesiologist best treat chronic pain?

• Does MEET the Rule of Three.
• This EQ does meet the Rule of Three. It has a proper framework because the author can research multiple topics and methods to discover the best treatment. The author can take a stance because the question format can allow the author to argue why his/her method is to treat chronic pain is the best method compared to other methods. The EQ has a proper format because it has no grammar mistakes and it defined a kind of pain.

3.

How can a museum volunteer effectively contribute to the experience of any type of visitor at a Aircraft and/or Science based museum?